Studio Unknown’s Confessions of a Small Working Studio—The Internet: The Birth of a New Focus?

Apr 1, 2010 5:04 PM, By Kevin Hill and Lisa Horan

Haggar Audio's Rob Haggar

Haggar Audio's Rob Haggar

More Changes
In addition to the Internet’s impact on the “how” of an audio professional’s work, it has also greatly impacted the “what.” Of the 70 percent of sound for picture work that Haggar Audio (Madison, Wisc.) does, roughly 60 percent ends up on the Internet, and a substantial chunk of the studio’s projects are being done strictly for the Internet. One such Internet-driven project was a series of “teaser” ads for Web-based GoDaddy.com, which aired during the Superbowl and directed viewers back to the GoDaddy site for the “reveal.” Haggar is also working on voice, music design and sound effects for three separate Websites that were created for the Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board to promote the use of dairy, along with several Internet videos for an American Family Insurance that were “heavy on the sound design.” “Most of the clients we deal with are hip to what the Internet can do for them,” says studio owner/sound designer Rob Haggar. “In fact, a lot of times it’s their first priority.” That was the case for Pennsylvania-based PPL Electric Utilities. To help complete a series of Webisodes, the company called on Mixology for significant sound design and mix work.

Companies are also seeking sound design services for less-traditional projects. Just consider a project DeVillar worked on for DeepRockDrive, a “revolutionary new music experience” that combines live performances with Internet capabilities, enabling fans and artists to interact with one another in a unique fashion. The project involved mixing music being performed live by artists on a soundstage to seven camera, HD video and then simultaneously Webcasting the performance. “What made the project especially interesting was not that the bands were performing live and I was having to mix on-the-fly, but that the artists were playing to 40 large-screen TVs that displayed feeds of fans watching, and they were able to interact with one another,” says DeVillar. Fans could also create their own versions of the show; they were given the ability to manipulate camera angles and provide feedback directly to the artists while they were onstage. The project required a team of expert software developers to put together and was viewed by as many as 10,000 viewers at one time.

Haggar is also working on voice, music design and sound effects for three separate Websites that were created for the Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board to promote the use of dairy.

Haggar is also working on voice, music design and sound effects for three separate Websites that were created for the Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board to promote the use of dairy.

The Case for Quality
It goes without saying that this new medium is the “next best thing” and will continue to rack up impressive statistics. The big issue from a sound perspective is, however, that sound quality on the Internet isn’t yet regulated like it is in broadcast and it tends to be all over the map quality-wise. So does that mean engineers should “dumb down” their mixes for projects that are being produced specifically for the Internet? That would be a resounding, “No way!”

“People may tolerate and expect a bad picture when bandwidth gets pinched, but they don’t tolerate bad sound very well,” says DeVillar. And bad sound is bad sound, whether it’s on the Internet or on TV. Take, for instance, a series of spots Mixology mixed for Bloomberg Sports. To meet a tight deadline, the very first of the spots was posted minus a professional mix. Instead, the production company producing the spots posted the initial one on the Web directly from the Avid. During a meeting, Kahn and one of the spot’s producers played that one and then compared it to one that Kahn had mixed. “To be honest, we were both shocked at the difference in quality,” says Kahn. “The truth is, it’s actually more important to mix projects that are airing on the Internet than for those on television because everything broadcast on the networks will go through some type of broadcast limiter, and there will be some control placed on loudness and dynamic range. But that’s not the case with the Internet.” It’s for that reason that Kahn tends to lighten up on the low end and mix brighter and with a lower dynamic range when he is working on a project for the Web. “With TV, you can get away with a decent amount of dynamic range, depending on content and context, but on the Web, certain audio elements can get lost a lot easier.”

DeVillar takes a slightly different approach, but also compensates for projects that he knows will be posted on YouTube. For starters, he makes sure that levels are optimized. “With the low bit rates that are present on YouTube, I’m careful to stay within mastering standards,” says DeVillar. Similar to Kahn, he makes sure that the mix doesn’t have a lot of unnecessary high end to prevent aliasing from the codecs.

Even if the initial plan for a project doesn’t involve the Internet, according to Haggar, it’s a good idea to assume that it will end up there. “It’s a safe bet that most of the projects we work on will wind up being posted on YouTube or somewhere else on the Internet, so I keep that in mind when I’m mixing,” says Haggar.”

But the biggest problem remains educating clients about the value of quality audio for Internet productions. There is still a perception that these types of projects are synonymous with lower budgets, but that’s simply not the case. “A project being produced for the Internet still has to be shot, edited, scored, mixed, et cetera, “ says Kahn. “It’s not like the process takes half the time, so why would it cost 50-percent less than a traditional project?”

While the mentality is beginning to change as more money is being spent on Internet advertising and more consumers are being exposed to these ads, there are already some companies that recognize that "good enough" just doesn’t cut it. “We spent multiple hours mixing the tutorials for PPL simply because they wanted a really great product,” says Kahn. “They could have cut the sound in the Avid, and they may have been able to get away with it, but they realized that it would all reflect on their brand, and if your brand sounds like garbage, your brand looks like garbage.”






Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

Mix Books

Modern Recording and Mixing

This 2-DVD set will show you how the best in the music industry set up a studio to make world-class records. Regardless of what gear you are using, the information you'll find here will allow you to take advantage of decades of expert knowledge. Order now $39.95

Mastering Cubase 4

Electronic Musician magazine and Thomson Course Technology PTR have joined forces again to create the second volume in their Personal Studio Series, Mastering Steinberg's Cubase(tm). Edited and produced by the staff of Electronic Musician, this special issue is not only a must-read for users of Cubase(tm) software, but it also delivers essential information for anyone recording/producing music in a personal-studio. Order now $12.95

Newsletters

MixLine

Delivered straight to your inbox every other week, MixLine takes you straight into the studio, with new product announcements, industry news, upcoming events, recent recording/post projects and much more. Click here to read the latest edition; sign up here.

MixLine Live

Delivered straight to your inbox every other week, MixLine Live takes you on the road with today's hottest tours, new sound reinforcement professional products, recent installs, industry news and much more. Click here to read the latest edition; sign up here.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]